Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants.In his reinterpretation,migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America.His approach rests on four separate propositions.
The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside;migrating to the New World was simply a“natural spillover”.Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English--They would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity.
Secondly,Bailyn holds that,contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks,there was never a typical New World community.For example,the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably.
Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants:one group came as indentured servants,another came to acquire land.Surprisingly,Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration.
These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America.At first,thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited;by the 1730’s,however,American employers demanded skilled artisans.
Finally,Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system.He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo—American empire.
But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery,as Bailyn does,devalues the achievements of colonial culture.It is true.as Bailyn claims that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England.But what of seventeenth—c
- A.It is totally implausible
- B.It is partially acceptable
- C.It is highly admirable
- D.It is controversial though persuasive
正确答案及解析
正确答案
解析
推理判断题。由第四段第二、三句话可知,在坚持殖民地是盎格鲁一美利坚帝国的一部分这一点上,Bailyn无疑是正确的。但是,把帝国分为英国核心和殖民地外围就贬低了殖民地文化的成就。由此可判断作者认为Bailyn的观点有一部分是可以接受的,故选B。
包含此试题的试卷
你可能感兴趣的试题
有“泥土诗人”之称的诗人是()。
-
- A.臧克家
- B.田间
- C.艾青
- D.许地山
- 查看答案
明朝初年强化君主专制的措施是()。
-
- A.增设军机处
- B.采用三省六部制
- C.废除丞相.权分六部
- D.设中书省为全国最高行政机构
- 查看答案
钱穆在评论中国古代某制度时说,它“可以培植全国人民对政治之兴味……可以团结全国各地域于一个中央之统治”,这一制度是()。
-
- A.郡县制
- B.察举制
- C.科举制
- D.行省制
- 查看答案
将下列各项按所表示年龄大小顺序排列,正确的顺序应是( )。
①不惑②垂髫③花甲④加冠⑤而立⑥古稀⑦半百
-
- A.②④①⑦⑤③⑥
- B.④②③⑥①⑦⑤
- C.⑥⑤③②④⑦①
- D.②④⑤①⑦③⑥
- 查看答案
1931年,一位给人们带来光明的科学家重病的消息牵动着世界人民的心,几十名记者为他守夜。每隔一个小时就对外发布一次消息:“灯”还亮着。这位科学家是( )。
-
- A.瓦特
- B.法拉第
- C.爱迪生
- D.爱因斯坦
- 查看答案