As[k]in the word“came”and[g]in the word“game”are said to form a distinctive opposition in English，they are_______．

Some teenagers harbour a generalized resentment against society，which________them the rights and privileges of adults，although physically they are mature．

All of the following underlined letters will make a loss of plosive EXCEPT___________．

Viewers continue to watch TV___________they complain about the quality of the programming．

As for the winter，it is inconvenient to be cold，with most of________furnace fuel is allowed saved for the dawn．

_______millions of people from rural areas continue to flood into large cities，white collars are retreating to smaller cities，in search of a relaxed lifestyle．

-Do you think that the Labor Bill will be passed?

-Oh，yes．It’s___________that it will．

I think the boss，rather than the workers，_______to blame for the fire that caused so many deaths．

The head of the phrase“the lovely house”is________．

The driver wanted to park his car near the roadside but was asked by the police________.

Which of the following words does NOT have a suffix?

According to F．de Saussure，________refers to the abstract linguistic systems hared by all the members of a speech community．

Pragmatics is particularly interested in the relationship between_______and the context in which they are used．

Spoken language is________．

Which of the following statements explains one benefit of inductive grammar teaching?

Which of the following activities represent the top—down approach?

Total Physical Response Method belongs to the comprehension approach which especially emphasis on the understanding of_______．Teachers give instructions in foreign language；students need to use body movements to respond to the teachers．

Among the major listening skills，_________is a skill which combines listening and writing，because it requires the listeners to write down，either word for word，or in his own words，what he considers important．

Which do we not have to take the following aspect into consideration when we select textbooks?

When should the teacher issue the instruction?

Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants．In his reinterpretation，migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America．His approach rests on four separate propositions．

The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside；migrating to the New World was simply a“natural spillover”．Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English--They would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity．

Secondly，Bailyn holds that，contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks，there was never a typical New World community．For example，the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably．

Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants：one group came as indentured servants，another came to acquire land．Surprisingly，Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration．

These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America．At first，thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited；by the 1730’s，however，American employers demanded skilled artisans．

Finally，Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system．He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo—American empire．

But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery，as Bailyn does，devalues the achievements of colonial culture.It is true．as Bailyn claims that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England．But what of seventeenth—c

Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants．In his reinterpretation，migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America．His approach rests on four separate propositions．

The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside；migrating to the New World was simply a“natural spillover”．Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English--They would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity．

Secondly，Bailyn holds that，contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks，there was never a typical New World community．For example，the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably．

Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants：one group came as indentured servants，another came to acquire land．Surprisingly，Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration．

These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America．At first，thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited；by the 1730’s，however，American employers demanded skilled artisans．

Finally，Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system．He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo—American empire．

But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery，as Bailyn does，devalues the achievements of colonial culture.It is true．as Bailyn claims that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England．But what of seventeenth—c

Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants．In his reinterpretation，migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America．His approach rests on four separate propositions．

The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside；migrating to the New World was simply a“natural spillover”．Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English--They would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity．

Secondly，Bailyn holds that，contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks，there was never a typical New World community．For example，the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably．

Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants：one group came as indentured servants，another came to acquire land．Surprisingly，Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration．

These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America．At first，thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited；by the 1730’s，however，American employers demanded skilled artisans．

Finally，Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system．He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo—American empire．

But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery，as Bailyn does，devalues the achievements of colonial culture.It is true．as Bailyn claims that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England．But what of seventeenth—c

Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants．In his reinterpretation，migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America．His approach rests on four separate propositions．

The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside；migrating to the New World was simply a“natural spillover”．Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English--They would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity．

Secondly，Bailyn holds that，contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks，there was never a typical New World community．For example，the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably．

Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants：one group came as indentured servants，another came to acquire land．Surprisingly，Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration．

These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America．At first，thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited；by the 1730’s，however，American employers demanded skilled artisans．

Finally，Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system．He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo—American empire．

But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery，as Bailyn does，devalues the achievements of colonial culture.It is true．as Bailyn claims that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England．But what of seventeenth—c

Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the United States by applying new social research findings on the experiences of European migrants．In his reinterpretation，migration becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of preindustrial North America．His approach rests on four separate propositions．

The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England moved regularly about their countryside；migrating to the New World was simply a“natural spillover”．Although at first the colonies held little positive attraction for the English--They would rather have stayed home—by the eighteenth century people increasingly migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of opportunity．

Secondly，Bailyn holds that，contrary to the notion that used to flourish in America history textbooks，there was never a typical New World community．For example，the economic and demographic character of early New England towns varied considerably．

Bailyn’s third proposition suggests two general patterns prevailing among the many thousands of migrants：one group came as indentured servants，another came to acquire land．Surprisingly，Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the driving forces of transatlantic migration．

These colonial entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who came to preindustrial North America．At first，thousands of unskilled laborers were recruited；by the 1730’s，however，American employers demanded skilled artisans．

Finally，Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized hinterland of the European culture system．He is undoubtedly correct to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo—American empire．

But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery，as Bailyn does，devalues the achievements of colonial culture.It is true．as Bailyn claims that high culture in the colonies never matched that in England．But what of seventeenth—c

It is plain that in the year 2020 everyone will have at his elbow several times more mechanical energy than he has today．There will be advance in biological knowledge as far reaching as those that have been made in physics．We are only beginning to learn that we can control our biological environment as well as our physical one．Starvation has been predicted twice to a growing world population：by Malthus in about 1800．by Crookes in about 1900．It was headed off the first time by taking agriculture to America and the second time by using the new fertilizers．In the year 2020，starvation will be headed off by the control of the diseases and the heredity of plants and animals--by shaping our own biological environment．

Now I come back to the haunting theme of automation．The most common species in the factory today is the man who works or minds a simple machine--the operator．By the year 2020，the repetitive tasks of industry will be taken over by the machines，as the heavy tasks were taken over long ago；and the mental tedium will go the way of physical exhaustion．Today we still distinguish，even among repetitive jobs，between the skilled and the unskilled；but in the year 2020 all repetition will be unskilled．We simply waste our time if we oppose this change；it is as inevitable as the year 2020 itself．

The article was written to__________．

It is plain that in the year 2020 everyone will have at his elbow several times more mechanical energy than he has today．There will be advance in biological knowledge as far reaching as those that have been made in physics．We are only beginning to learn that we can control our biological environment as well as our physical one．Starvation has been predicted twice to a growing world population：by Malthus in about 1800．by Crookes in about 1900．It was headed off the first time by taking agriculture to America and the second time by using the new fertilizers．In the year 2020，starvation will be headed off by the control of the diseases and the heredity of plants and animals--by shaping our own biological environment．

Now I come back to the haunting theme of automation．The most common species in the factory today is the man who works or minds a simple machine--the operator．By the year 2020，the repetitive tasks of industry will be taken over by the machines，as the heavy tasks were taken over long ago；and the mental tedium will go the way of physical exhaustion．Today we still distinguish，even among repetitive jobs，between the skilled and the unskilled；but in the year 2020 all repetition will be unskilled．We simply waste our time if we oppose this change；it is as inevitable as the year 2020 itself．

Advances in biological knowledge__________．

It is plain that in the year 2020 everyone will have at his elbow several times more mechanical energy than he has today．There will be advance in biological knowledge as far reaching as those that have been made in physics．We are only beginning to learn that we can control our biological environment as well as our physical one．Starvation has been predicted twice to a growing world population：by Malthus in about 1800．by Crookes in about 1900．It was headed off the first time by taking agriculture to America and the second time by using the new fertilizers．In the year 2020，starvation will be headed off by the control of the diseases and the heredity of plants and animals--by shaping our own biological environment．

Now I come back to the haunting theme of automation．The most common species in the factory today is the man who works or minds a simple machine--the operator．By the year 2020，the repetitive tasks of industry will be taken over by the machines，as the heavy tasks were taken over long ago；and the mental tedium will go the way of physical exhaustion．Today we still distinguish，even among repetitive jobs，between the skilled and the unskilled；but in the year 2020 all repetition will be unskilled．We simply waste our time if we oppose this change；it is as inevitable as the year 2020 itself．

According to the passage，starvation__________·

It is plain that in the year 2020 everyone will have at his elbow several times more mechanical energy than he has today．There will be advance in biological knowledge as far reaching as those that have been made in physics．We are only beginning to learn that we can control our biological environment as well as our physical one．Starvation has been predicted twice to a growing world population：by Malthus in about 1800．by Crookes in about 1900．It was headed off the first time by taking agriculture to America and the second time by using the new fertilizers．In the year 2020，starvation will be headed off by the control of the diseases and the heredity of plants and animals--by shaping our own biological environment．

Now I come back to the haunting theme of automation．The most common species in the factory today is the man who works or minds a simple machine--the operator．By the year 2020，the repetitive tasks of industry will be taken over by the machines，as the heavy tasks were taken over long ago；and the mental tedium will go the way of physical exhaustion．Today we still distinguish，even among repetitive jobs，between the skilled and the unskilled；but in the year 2020 all repetition will be unskilled．We simply waste our time if we oppose this change；it is as inevitable as the year 2020 itself．

Repetitive tasks in industry lead to__________．

It is plain that in the year 2020 everyone will have at his elbow several times more mechanical energy than he has today．There will be advance in biological knowledge as far reaching as those that have been made in physics．We are only beginning to learn that we can control our biological environment as well as our physical one．Starvation has been predicted twice to a growing world population：by Malthus in about 1800．by Crookes in about 1900．It was headed off the first time by taking agriculture to America and the second time by using the new fertilizers．In the year 2020，starvation will be headed off by the control of the diseases and the heredity of plants and animals--by shaping our own biological environment．

Now I come back to the haunting theme of automation．The most common species in the factory today is the man who works or minds a simple machine--the operator．By the year 2020，the repetitive tasks of industry will be taken over by the machines，as the heavy tasks were taken over long ago；and the mental tedium will go the way of physical exhaustion．Today we still distinguish，even among repetitive jobs，between the skilled and the unskilled；but in the year 2020 all repetition will be unskilled．We simply waste our time if we oppose this change；it is as inevitable as the year 2020 itself．

If the predictions of the writer are realized，the demand for the unskilled workers in 21 st century will be__________．

课堂提问是课堂教学过程中教师和学生交流的方式之一，请简述课堂提问的要求。

下列教学片段选自某一初中课堂实录，阅读后回答问题。

T：Could you play games on Internet every evening，boys and girls?

Ss：Sorry．I couldn’t．

T：On what day could you play them every week?

Ss：Only on Saturday and Sunday．

T：Oh!We could say you could play games twice a week．I could go visit my friends on Monday and Tuesday evenings．So we could say I could go visit my friends twice a week．What does TWICE here mean?

Ss：It means“两次”．

T：Great!Then you will be divided into groups，four in one group，to make sentences as many as possible by“Could you…every week?”and“twice a week”．After 5 minutes，I’ll invite one speaker out of each group to present in class．

问题：

（1）该片段反映了教学中哪两个环节?

（2）分析这两个教学环节的目的。

（3）从教学有效性的角度评价这个教学片段（至少写两个要点）。

设计任务：请阅读下面学生信息和语言素材，设计一节英语语言知识课的教学方案。教案没有固定格式，但必须包含下列要点：

●teaching objectives

●teaching contents

●key and difficult points

●major steps and time allocation

●activities and justifications

教学时间：45分钟

学生概况：某城镇普通中学八年级（初中二年级）学生，班级人数40人。多数已经达到《义务教育英语课程标准（2011年版）》三级水平。学生课堂参与积极性一般。

语言素材：