During the past generation, the American middle-class family that once could count on hard work and fair play to keep itself financially secure has been transformed by economic risk and new realities. Now a pink slip, a bad diagnosis, or a disappearing spouse can reduce a family from solidly middle class to newly poor in a few months.
In just one generation, millions of mothers have gone to work, transforming basic family economics. Scholars, policymakers, and critics of all stripes have debated the social implications of these changes, but few have looked at the side effect: family risk has risen as well. Today's families have budgeted to the limits of their new two-paycheck status. As a result, they have lost the parachute they once had in times of financial setback-a back-up earner (usually Mom) who could go into the workforce if the primary earner got laid off or fell sick. This "added-worker effect" could support the safety net offered by unemployment insurance or disability insurance to help families weather bad times. But today, a disruption to family fortunes can no longer be made up with extra income from an otherwise-stay-at-home partner.
During the same period, families have been asked to absorb much more risk in their retirement income. Steelworkers, airline employees, and now those in the auto industry are joining millions of families who must worry about interest rates, stock market fluctuation, and the harsh reality that they may outlive their retirement money. For much of the past year, President Bush campaigned to move Social Security to a saving-account model, with retirees trading much or all of their guaranteed payments for payments depending on investment returns. For younger families, the picture is not any better. Both the absolute cost of healthcare and the share of it borne by families have risen--and newly fashionable health-savings plans are spreading from legislative halls to WalMart workers, with much higher deductibles an
- A.a higher sense of security
- B.less secured payments
- C.less chance to invest
- D.a guaranteed future
正确答案及解析
正确答案
解析
细节题。根据题干定位到第三段。由第三、四句“President Bush campaigned to move Social Security to a saving-account model,with retirees trading much or all of their guaranteed payments for pay-ments depending on investment returns.For younger families,the picture is not any better."可以分析布什总统改革的结果可能会减少退休工有保障的报酬,所以选B项“less secured payments(减少保障性报酬)”为正确选项。其余选项均不符合题意。
包含此试题的试卷
你可能感兴趣的试题
“有为才有位,有位更有为”,这一看法给我们的启示是( )
-
- A.实践决定认识,认识对发展具有推动作用
- B.实现人生价值必须先要实现人的自我价值
- C.人生真正价值在于社会价值与自我价值的统一
- D.要发挥主观能动性,要不断积累自我价值
- 查看答案
历史唯物主义认为人的价值在于( )
-
- A.个人的自我创造和自我实现
- B.个人的自我选择和自由发展
- C.个人主体性的增强和摆脱社会的制约
- D.个人对社会的贡献和社会对个人的尊重
- 查看答案
对立统一规律揭示了事物发展的( )。
-
- A.辩证形式
- B.趋势和道路
- C.不同状态
- D.源泉和动力
- 查看答案
矛盾的普遍性与特殊性的关系是( )
-
- A.一般与个别的关系
- B.整体与局部的关系
- C.绝对与相对的关系
- D.可以相互转化的关系
- 查看答案
在认识过程中具有更为重要意义的飞跃是指()
-
- A.从外在形象到内在本质的飞跃
- B.从个性认识到共性认识的飞跃
- C.从肯定阶段到否定阶段的飞跃
- D.从理性认识到实践的飞跃
- 查看答案