题目详情

Consumers are being confused and misled by the hodge-podge of environmental claims made by household products, according to a "green labeling" study published by Consumers International Friday.

Among the report's more outrageous findings--a German fertilizer described itself as "earthworm friendly" a brand of flour said it was "non-polluting" and a British toilet paper claimed to be "environmentally friendlier".

The study was written and researched by Britain's National Consumer Council (NCC) for lobby group Consumer International. It was funded by the German and Dutch governments and the European Commission.

"While many good and useful claims are being made, it is clear there is a long way to go in ensuring shoppers are adequately informed about the environmental impact of products they buy." said Consumers International director Anna Fielder.

The lO-country study surveyed product packaging in Britain, Western Europe, Scandinavia and the United States. It found that products sold in Germany and the United Kingdom made the most environmental claims on average.

The report focused on claims made by specific products, such as detergent insect sprays and by some garden products. It did not test the claims, but compared them to labeling guidelines set by the International Standards Organization (ISO) in September,1999.

Researchers documented claims of environmental friendliness made by about 2,000 products and found many too vague or too misleading to meet ISO standards.

"Many products had specially-designed labels to make them seem environmentally friendly, but in fact many of these symbols mean nothing." said report researcher Philip Page.

"Laundry detergents made the most number of claims with 158. Household cleaners were second with 145 separate claims, while paints were third on our list with 73. The high numbers show how very confusing it must be for consumers to sort the true from the misleading." he said.

The ISO labeling standards ban vague or misleading claims on product packaging, because terms such as "environmentally friendly" and "non-polluting" can not be verified. "What we are now pushing for is to have multinational corporations meet the standards set by the ISO." said Page.

What is one of the consequences caused by the many claims of household products?

  • A.They are likely to lead to serious environmental problems
  • B.Consumers find it difficult to tell the true from the false
  • C.They could arouse widespread anger among consumers
  • D.Consumers will be tempted to buy products they don't need

正确答案及解析

正确答案
B
解析

此题暂无解析由倒数第二段的“The high numbers show how very confusing it must be for consumers tosort the true from the misleadin9”,大意是环保说明如此之多。以至消费者很难去伪存真。这句话的意思和B的表述一致,所以选择8。

包含此试题的试卷

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

下列关于公司的表述,正确的是()

  • A.子公司不具有法人资格
  • B.分公司具有独立承担民亊责任的资格
  • C.—个自然人只能投资设立一个一人有限责任公司
  • D.一人有限责任公司的注册资本最低限额为人民币十万元。股东可分次足额缴纳公司章程规定的出资额
查看答案
单选题

以下各项列举了我国常见气象灾害与其发生地区的对应关系,其中正确的一项是()

  • A.洪涝一西北地区
  • B.洪涝一东北地区
  • C.春旱一华南地区
  • D.伏旱一华北地区
查看答案
单选题

根据电视收视率调査,看体育节目的观众中青年人比中老年人要多。

由此可推断出()

  • A.体育节目可能更适合青年人的兴趣
  • B.体育节目是专属青年人的运动
  • C.中老年人不喜欢体育节目
  • D.青年人比中年人更擅长体育运动
查看答案
单选题

—种海洋蜗牛产生的毒素含有多种蛋白,把其中的一种给老鼠注射后,会使有两星期大或更小的老鼠陷入睡眠状态,而使大一点的老鼠躲藏起来。当老鼠受到突然的严重威胁时,非常小的那些老鼠的反应是呆住,而较大的那些老鼠会逃跑。

以上陈述的事实最有力地支持了以下哪项假说?()

  • A.非常小的老鼠很可能与较大的老鼠一样易于遭受突发性的严重威胁
  • B.注射到鼠体的包含在蜗牛毒素中的蛋白的主要功能是通过诱导蜗牛处于完全的静止中而起到保护蜗牛的作用
  • C.如果给成年老鼠大剂量地注射这种蛋白质,也会使它们陷入睡眠状态
  • D.老鼠对突然的严重威胁的反应受其体内生成的一种化学物质的刺激,这物质与注射到老鼠体内的蛋白质相似
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案

相关题库更多 +